Builder-investor partnerships for property renovations. Fair splits based on who funds it. 3–4 month close.
You own a property that needs work. I have the expertise and the connections. Instead of selling low, taking a contractor's markup, or getting stuck managing the renovations yourself—we partner.
Here's the key: We split profit, not your total return. Your capital comes back first. Then we split what's left. If you fund the renovation: 50/50 profit split. If I fund it: 70/30 split (I carry the capital risk, so I take the larger share). Either way, your capital is protected and paid first.
You fund the renovation. Your capital comes back first. Then we split remaining profit down the middle:
I bring the money — my own or a loan I find and manage. After capital is returned, we split profit 70/30:
You want it gone. I make a cash offer, acquire it, and handle everything. You're done.
For partnership scenarios (1 & 2): Capital is returned first. Before any profit is split, the capital provider (you or the lender) gets their money back. Then the remaining profit is split per the scenario.
All splits negotiable per project specifics. This is the framework.
If you want to partner and share in the upside:
Property as-is: $250K | Needs $75K work | Will sell for $500K
Scenario: I fund it. The loan ($100K) is paid back first. Then we split the $150K remaining profit: 30% you, 70% me.
$500K exit − $250K as-is value − $100K loan repaid
Gross profit to split: $150K
Closed in 4 months. You brought the property. I brought the capital and executed the renovation.
What if you funded the renovation? Same property, same $150K profit after your capital is returned. Split becomes 50/50: you keep $75K, I keep $75K. The difference is who carries the capital risk. When I fund it, that risk and the loan are mine to manage, so I take the larger share. When you fund it, we are even partners on the upside — you brought the property and the money, I brought the build.